<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breakfast Doesn&#8217;t Make Teens Lose Weight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futilecycle.com/2008/03/04/breakfast-doesnt-make-teens-lose-weight/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futilecycle.com/2008/03/04/breakfast-doesnt-make-teens-lose-weight</link>
	<description>A Wandering Through Life and Science</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eating breakfast doesn&#8217;t make teens lose weight &#171; Science Notes</title>
		<link>http://futilecycle.com/2008/03/04/breakfast-doesnt-make-teens-lose-weight#comment-4792</link>
		<dc:creator>Eating breakfast doesn&#8217;t make teens lose weight &#171; Science Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futilecycle.com/2008/03/04/breakfast-doesnt-make-teens-lose-weight#comment-4792</guid>
		<description>[...] on average. That doesn’t mean that suddenly eating breakfast more will make you lose weight. [Read more]   Posted in people, pseudoscience, science. Tags: health, nutrition, people, pseudoscience, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on average. That doesn’t mean that suddenly eating breakfast more will make you lose weight. [Read more]   Posted in people, pseudoscience, science. Tags: health, nutrition, people, pseudoscience, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://futilecycle.com/2008/03/04/breakfast-doesnt-make-teens-lose-weight#comment-4593</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 05:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futilecycle.com/2008/03/04/breakfast-doesnt-make-teens-lose-weight#comment-4593</guid>
		<description>We officially live in a post truth world- the intellectual rot is overwhelming. I am a research scientist and I am seriously about to start shopping around for the whackiest, most frothing-at-the-mouth church to join to ensure my future prosperity.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We officially live in a post truth world- the intellectual rot is overwhelming. I am a research scientist and I am seriously about to start shopping around for the whackiest, most frothing-at-the-mouth church to join to ensure my future prosperity&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://futilecycle.com/2008/03/04/breakfast-doesnt-make-teens-lose-weight#comment-4577</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futilecycle.com/2008/03/04/breakfast-doesnt-make-teens-lose-weight#comment-4577</guid>
		<description>I think many journalists are too lazy or lack the scientific capacity to actually read the science articles, so they just go off of the press releases from universities. I have to say, though, that the Pediatrics article doesn't really emphasize the lack of causality in the paper very much; they mention that the study is just an association basically in two or three short sentences, one of which is in the abstract. The authors themselves seem to proclaim the study as a nearly causal link, if you read the interviews with them. So I'm not really that surprised that the journalists are overhyping the study, when the authors themselves do too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think many journalists are too lazy or lack the scientific capacity to actually read the science articles, so they just go off of the press releases from universities. I have to say, though, that the Pediatrics article doesn&#8217;t really emphasize the lack of causality in the paper very much; they mention that the study is just an association basically in two or three short sentences, one of which is in the abstract. The authors themselves seem to proclaim the study as a nearly causal link, if you read the interviews with them. So I&#8217;m not really that surprised that the journalists are overhyping the study, when the authors themselves do too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apollo</title>
		<link>http://futilecycle.com/2008/03/04/breakfast-doesnt-make-teens-lose-weight#comment-4574</link>
		<dc:creator>Apollo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futilecycle.com/2008/03/04/breakfast-doesnt-make-teens-lose-weight#comment-4574</guid>
		<description>From the conclusion in the Pediatrics abstract, you'd think the folks at Reuters would take note not to overstate the claims (i.e. as clear a disclaimer about the inability to establish causality as any)... but I suppose they're in the business of making news and mountains out of molehills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the conclusion in the Pediatrics abstract, you&#8217;d think the folks at Reuters would take note not to overstate the claims (i.e. as clear a disclaimer about the inability to establish causality as any)&#8230; but I suppose they&#8217;re in the business of making news and mountains out of molehills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.418 seconds -->
