<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s wrong with scientific jargon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futilecycle.com/2008/01/08/whats-wrong-with-scientific-jargon/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futilecycle.com/2008/01/08/whats-wrong-with-scientific-jargon</link>
	<description>A Wandering Through Life and Science</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://futilecycle.com/2008/01/08/whats-wrong-with-scientific-jargon/comment-page-1#comment-3461</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 07:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futilecycle.com/2008/01/08/whats-wrong-with-scientific-jargon#comment-3461</guid>
		<description>But how else are scientists supposed to exert their intellectual and egotistical dominion over others? :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But how else are scientists supposed to exert their intellectual and egotistical dominion over others? <img src='http://futilecycle.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://futilecycle.com/2008/01/08/whats-wrong-with-scientific-jargon/comment-page-1#comment-3376</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futilecycle.com/2008/01/08/whats-wrong-with-scientific-jargon#comment-3376</guid>
		<description>Yes, I realize that they all have their origins, but let's face it, there's no need for four different names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I realize that they all have their origins, but let&#8217;s face it, there&#8217;s no need for four different names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://futilecycle.com/2008/01/08/whats-wrong-with-scientific-jargon/comment-page-1#comment-3367</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futilecycle.com/2008/01/08/whats-wrong-with-scientific-jargon#comment-3367</guid>
		<description>lol... well:

1. they were discovered "simultaneously" by three groups
2. MAVS makes the most sense to me b/c it describes where it is (and was founded by the group who actually discovered where the protein was and had the best paper out of the bunch)
3. Cardif is based on the fact that the protein has CARD domains
4. VISA was coined by a bunch of people who wanted to be cute and name a whole bunch of proteins after the "Card" naming motif (ie Mastercard would have been next)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol&#8230; well:</p>
<p>1. they were discovered &#8220;simultaneously&#8221; by three groups<br />
2. MAVS makes the most sense to me b/c it describes where it is (and was founded by the group who actually discovered where the protein was and had the best paper out of the bunch)<br />
3. Cardif is based on the fact that the protein has CARD domains<br />
4. VISA was coined by a bunch of people who wanted to be cute and name a whole bunch of proteins after the &#8220;Card&#8221; naming motif (ie Mastercard would have been next)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.260 seconds -->
