September 24, 2007

It Doesn’t Make Any Sense!

Posted by Eric at 7:38 pm | Category: Biology, Literature, Science

Biology (and science in general) has some jargon that sticks around long past the point where they should be buried. “Sense”, for example, is a really popular one. It gave rise to all sorts of derivative words (”anti-sense”, “nonsense”, “mis-sense”), but really those words reflect what geneticists thought of the “DNA code” back in the mid-twentieth century, when they were just beginning to realize that changes in the DNA sequences of genes led to changes in the proteins that were translated from them. The scientists thought of the DNA sequence as the “code” for the protein sequence, but they didn’t know exactly how the two corresponded with each other, which was why all their jargon was very metaphorical: “nonsense”, “commas”, and so on.

“Nonsense” is actually easier to explain than “sense”, so we’ll start with that. Researchers were studying how mutations in genes affected the proteins they coded. Certain mutations, they figured, might scramble the DNA into a sequence that wouldn’t make any “sense” if you tried to translate its code into a protein sequence. Hence, they called these scrambles “nonsense” mutations. Later, however, they found that the “nonsense” mutations didn’t really scramble or garble the instructions for the protein, but that they were just a code for “Stop! This is the end of the protein!” “Nonsense” sequences were naturally occuring “periods” at the end of code “sentences,” so to speak, and the mutations were just putting these periods into the middle of the sentences and truncating them. The cell knew exactly what they meant; they weren’t nonsense at all! But the name stuck, and even today, the particular codons that mark the end of a protein are sometimes referred to as “nonsense codons,” even though the cell knows exactly what they mean.

Of course, scientists, being tinkerers, started to change the endings of the names in order to get new words with related meanings. So if a stop code is called “nonsense”, then everything aside from that is called “sense.” Since there are two strands of DNA, the one that has the code is called “sense”, the other is called “anti-sense” (since “nonsense” is already taken). And if a “nonsense” code mutates to “sense” (or if one “sensible” code mutates to another), then that’s called “missense.” And so on and so forth.

So here we are with this arcane jargon that dates back to the 1950, from before we figured out how genes worked, and yet we’re still stuck with it for historical reasons. It could be worse. We could all still use the word “cistron” instead of “gene.” :-P

2 Responses to “It Doesn’t Make Any Sense!”

  1. Apollo Says:
    September 25th, 2007 at 8:47 am

    I thought the term cistron was still used for bacterial genetics. Was it used for human/mammalian genetics before?

    Yeah, there have been many times when I’ve wished that biologists were was systematic and clear in their naming schemes as chemists. Last year, I was very grateful for the group of anatomists that convened however many years ago to replace all of the stupid eponyms with Latin names that actually describe what they are referring to (e.g. I know Purkinge is a cool name, but why does every cell in the body have to be called that? It’s like Alexander the Great naming two dozen cities in his empire “Alexandria”, and then one city “Bucephalus” after his horse).

  2. Eric Says:
    September 25th, 2007 at 9:07 am

    I hope people don’t use cistron anymore. The origin of the word is in “cis-trans” complementation assays. If two mutations were on the same “cistron”, then they would complement in the diploid differently depending on whether the mutations were in cis or in trans. I think the term was used pretty widely in all genetics for a while, though “gene” obviously superseded it.

Leave a Reply