<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That 0.1% Variation in the Human Genome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futilecycle.com/2007/07/28/that-01-variation-in-the-human-genome/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futilecycle.com/2007/07/28/that-01-variation-in-the-human-genome</link>
	<description>A Wandering Through Life and Science</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Futile Cycle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Revisiting Race in Medicine</title>
		<link>http://futilecycle.com/2007/07/28/that-01-variation-in-the-human-genome#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>The Futile Cycle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Revisiting Race in Medicine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 05:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futilecycle.com/2007/07/28/that-01-variation-in-the-human-genome#comment-564</guid>
		<description>[...] in Scientific American arguing against race-based medicine. I spoke about this on an aside in a post a few days ago, but now I feel like I have to respond to the Scientific American article. Note that I&#8217;m not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Scientific American arguing against race-based medicine. I spoke about this on an aside in a post a few days ago, but now I feel like I have to respond to the Scientific American article. Note that I&#8217;m not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://futilecycle.com/2007/07/28/that-01-variation-in-the-human-genome#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futilecycle.com/2007/07/28/that-01-variation-in-the-human-genome#comment-560</guid>
		<description>Well, thinking is one thing. But everyone loves someone, and that's probably something that elicits more empathy. It makes others feel more real and human. After all, if even soldiers on the other side loved and cared for someone, can they really be all bad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, thinking is one thing. But everyone loves someone, and that&#8217;s probably something that elicits more empathy. It makes others feel more real and human. After all, if even soldiers on the other side loved and cared for someone, can they really be all bad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://futilecycle.com/2007/07/28/that-01-variation-in-the-human-genome#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futilecycle.com/2007/07/28/that-01-variation-in-the-human-genome#comment-559</guid>
		<description>"a brain that loves" --- not thinks? Just random comment :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;a brain that loves&#8221; &#8212; not thinks? Just random comment <img src='http://futilecycle.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.391 seconds -->
