March 24, 2007

Teaching Mathematics

Posted by Eric at 10:20 pm | Category: Links, Medicine, Science

The bloggers at Effect Measure are doing a magnum opus blog miniseries on introducing math models in medicine and public health (or rather, one particular model) to the general public. It’s a very admirable and difficult thing that they’re tackling. Explaining mathematics to the general public is hard, because most people stop listening as soon as they hear the word “mathematics,” Just at the door, they stop without entering, not knowing how much they’re missing out.

It’s kind of sad, actually. We lament over the fact that some people can’t read, but we don’t always lament over people not being able to do math. In fact, for some circles, it’s a point of perverse pride. “Oh, I can’t do math” is an acceptable phrase in, say, literary circles, when in reality we should be as shocked about so-called “educated people” saying that as when any “educated” person would say “Oh, I can’t read.” To grasp the essential, math isn’t any harder than reading. At the highest level, math is quite difficult, but so is, say, reading James Joyce’s Finnegans Wake. Most of us don’t need to get anywhere near that level to do useful things. But people right now need a push to get to the mathematical ability level that one would consider appropriate for the “educated.”

Thus, Effect Measure’s magnificent foray into educating the public. They’re very good writers and teachers, and I highly suggest it to anyone who’s afraid of the math in science. So far, they have five articles in the “modeling antiviral resistance” series discussing one paper on pandemic influenza and antiviral resistance a little bit at a time (through 16 projected blog posts!), aimed to the general audience with no prior experience necessary:
I. What is a model?
II. A modeling paper
III. Introduction. What’s the paper about?
IV. The essential assumption
Sidebar: Thinking mathematically

It’s kind of sad, actually. We lament over the fact that some people can’t read, but we don’t always lament over people not being able to do math. In fact, for some circles, it’s a point of perverse pride. “Oh, I can’t do math” is an acceptable phrase in, say, literary circles, when in reality we should be as shocked about so-called “educated people” saying that as when any “educated” person would say “Oh, I can’t read.” To grasp the essential, math isn’t any harder than reading. At the highest level, math is quite difficult, but so is, say, reading James Joyce’s Finnegans Wake. Most of us don’t need to get anywhere near that level to do useful things. But people right now need a push to get to the mathematical ability level that one would consider appropriate for the “educated.”

Thus, Effect Measure’s magnificent foray into educating the public. They’re very good writers and teachers, and I highly suggest it to anyone who’s afraid of the math in science. So far, they have five articles in the “modeling antiviral resistance” series discussing one paper on pandemic influenza and antiviral resistance a little bit at a time (through 16 projected blog posts!), aimed to the general audience with no prior experience necessary:
I. What is a model?
II. A modeling paper
III. Introduction. What’s the paper about?
IV. The essential assumption
Sidebar: Thinking mathematically

2 Responses to “Teaching Mathematics”

  1. Apollo Says:
    March 25th, 2007 at 12:10 pm

    You make a very good point, that it’s disturbing that otherwise educated people find it acceptable to be incompetent in mathematics. I do admit to often feeling that way, particularly with anything beyond differential equations and single-variable calculus, but it’s mostly in a “not interesting to me, but more power to you if it is” sort of way. However, so far during this first year in medical school, a thorough and second-nature understanding of calculus, particularly in interpreting formulas and graphs, is absolutely essential to understanding human physiology and pathophysiology.

    At the same time, though, I’m sure there are plenty of scientists and mathematicians who have never, or have only rarely, read dense literary works.

    I’m not sure if Effect Measure does this, but I think it would be nice if there were a greater exposure in education as to how various formulas and math-based discoveries in science came about in the context of the contemporary understanding of those subjects. I think most people think that formulas and principles and laws just spontaneously appear out of nowhere, which leads them to be less appreciative of mathematical discoveries and more appreciative of, say, a large tome of literature.

  2. andrew monkman Says:
    April 12th, 2007 at 3:22 pm

    This may be of interest to you!! (I AM NOT A SPAMMER!!)

Leave a Reply